2. THE REACTION RATE IS HIGHER FOR LADIES.
Overall, I messaged 33 guys, and 13 reacted, many of them within hours or even just every day. In comparison, my co host, Ben, got just one return regarding the 20+ messages he sent inside the very own form of the test. There is no distinction in reaction if we delivered a message that is particularly thoughtful one thing easy. Ben’s take on that? “If a man is interested, it does not matter just just what the message states.”
3. . BUT IT DOESN’T NECESSARILY LEAD TO ENGAGING OR REPEAT EXCHANGES.
Away from those 13 dudes, just seven messaged a 2nd time after we’d taken care of immediately them, and away from those dudes, just five asked me away. You would genuinely believe that, hell, five times from 33 communications to dudes you wanna meet is actuallyn’t bad, right? It mightn’t be if all five of these invites generated dates that are real. But away from those five dudes (in addition to the additional three that relocated to texting conversations), only 1 resulted in a genuine, live, within the flesh meeting. And nine just ghosted totally at one point or any other.
The Takeaway: You can’t personally take this. It absolutely was difficult not to ever get my hopes up whenever those 13 reactions arrived in quickly.