The Philadelphia Inquirer is normally pro-prosecution.
It really is a thing that defendants in a lengthy type of corruption cases can verify, such as for instance Vince Fumo, Chaka Fattah, the rogue that is so-called, previous L&We Inspector Dominic Verdi, the Traffic Court judges, state Senator Larry Farnese, etc.
The Inquirer’s typical pattern is always to trumpet the allegations of prosecutors as proven facts, which is often a nagging issue in terms of the presumption of purity. Additionally it is troublesome in the event that defendants within these corruption cases are actually discovered not liable at test, just like the rogue cops, Verdi, and Farnese. Most likely, that is why the games are played by them, because sometimes the underdogs winnings.
But on Monday, the Inky did one thing brand new within the war on defendants in corruption situations: they really denounced a few defendants regarding the editorial web page as they had been on test with their everyday lives.